Overview
AI can seem like an easy way to quickly get answers and share instant findings with your team. This approach often backfires because it leads to:
Trusting fake insights that AI creates from bad or incomplete data
Not forming your own understanding of the problem
Getting analysis that sounds good but doesn't actually help
This workflow helps you build the right prompts for the right data and work more effectively with your support data overall.
Workflow
Step 1: Pick a Clear Starting Theme
Choose one specific area to focus on. Don't try to analyze everything at once.
Good starting themes:
Tickets that received DSAT survey responses
Interactions with high comment counts (over X comments)
Cases tagged with high handle time
Tickets escalated to management
Specific product or feature complaints
How to choose:
Pick something you can clearly define and filter for
Choose themes where you have enough data (at least 20-30 tickets)
Focus on areas that actually matter to your team's goals
Step 2: Find and Filter Your Tickets
Locate these tickets in your worksheet or performance dashboard and apply filters to get your dataset.
Check your filtered results:
Do you have at least 20-30 tickets? (Less than this won't give meaningful patterns)
Are the tickets actually related to your theme? (Skim through a few examples)
Do the tickets contain enough detail for analysis?
Evaluate if your data will work with AI:
AI cannot process or analyze:
Names of people in interactions (gets removed for privacy)
Timestamps or specific dates
Ticket metadata like tags or custom fields
Screen recordings or attachments
PDFs or non-text files
What this means:
If your analysis depends on these elements, you'll need a different approach.
For example:
If you want to analyze response times, you need timestamps that the LLM will not factor in when analyzing your conversation data
You will need to create a Standard Classifier to help flag long response time tickets and then use that as a filter for your Classifier and/or Worksheet
Step 3: Choose Your Analysis Path
Based on what you found in Step 2, decide how to proceed:
Use Standard Classifiers when you need to:
Count specific events or phrases
Track when agents use particular scripts or responses
Calculate metrics that require metadata (like time between comments)
Filter for tickets that meet complex criteria
Layer multiple conditions together
Proceed to AI analysis when you have:
Tickets with enough conversational content
A clear theme that doesn't depend on metadata
Questions about sentiment, themes, or patterns in conversations
Need for understanding context and meaning
If you don't have enough tickets or the right type of data:
Adjust your filters (broaden or narrow your criteria)
Pick a different theme
Combine with Standard Classifiers to get a better dataset
Step 4: Test Your Dataset with AI
Before writing a detailed prompt, do a quick test to see if your data works:
Simple test prompt:
"Look at these tickets and tell me what the main themes are."
What to look for in results:
Does the AI identify themes that make sense?
Are the examples it gives actually from your data?
Do the patterns match what you see when you skim the tickets?
If the test works: Proceed to building your structured prompt
If the test doesn't work: Go back to Step 2 and adjust your dataset or filters
Step 5: Iterate Based on Results
Your first prompt rarely gives you everything you need. Plan to refine:
When initial results are too broad:
Add more specific context about your business
Narrow your focus to one specific aspect
Ask for more examples of the most important theme
When results miss the point:
Check if your dataset actually contains what you're looking for
Clarify your goal - be more specific about what you want to learn
Adjust your filters and try again
When results look wrong:
Verify the examples the AI gives you (do those ticket IDs actually exist?)
Check if the AI is making assumptions about your business that aren't true
Consider if your theme was too vague to begin with
Remember: It's normal to go through this process 2-3 times before getting useful results. The workflow isn't about getting it perfect on the first try - it's about approaching the problem systematically.